Re: This is retarded.
2005-09-03 10:38:01
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 02:38:59PM -0700, Joe Rhett wrote:
> > > > You know you have a DLE that is too big to tape and that amanda
> > > > does not handle it well. Isn't it time to stop wasting time
> > > > and tape and split the DLE?
>
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:51:15AM -0700, Joe Rhett wrote:
> > > Ah, I'm sorry! I should not assume that amanda can do it's own math. I
> > > must sit down with a calculator every night and do my own estimates and
> > > make this all work?
> > > Jon, this is a fairly serious problem with amanda. Why are you blaming
> > > the
> > > reporter instead of trying to fix the problem?
>
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:14:16PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > No, I was commenting on the futility of trying again something that failed
> > once unexpectedly, you knew it was going to fail again, and have known from
> > 5 years of amanda experience that that particular situation would always
> > fail.
>
> THAT was already done. Several days ago. What I didn't stop to do was
> delete the amount to flush because I assumed amanda would do the math and
> realize it couldn't back it up and then discard it. I didn't expect taper
> to blindly attempt something guaranteed to fail.
Discard a perfectly valid dump? Possibly the one and only copy of some data?
It still could be used by a SysAdmin in a number of ways. For example, it
could be manually taped or stored in some manner; it could be used for amanda
restore/recovery from the holding disk. I wouldn't assume, nor want, amanda
to discard it under the conditions you encountered. How to deal with the
unexpected situation should be the SA's decision.
--
Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com
JG Computing
4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159
Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
|
|
|