Re: This is retarded.
2005-09-01 17:24:45
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005 at 9:51am, Joe Rhett wrote
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 03:46:36PM -0700, Joe Rhett wrote:
> > > Yeah, I didn't need those tapes for anything else. Let's just waste 12
> > > hours and 3 tapes doing absolutely NOTHING.
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 07:22:53PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > What's the saying?
> > "If you keep doing what you've been doing
> > you'll keep getting what you've been getting!"
> >
> > You know you have a DLE that is too big to tape and that amanda
> > does not handle it well. Isn't it time to stop wasting time
> > and tape and split the DLE?
>
> Ah, I'm sorry! I should not assume that amanda can do it's own math. I
> must sit down with a calculator every night and do my own estimates and
> make this all work?
>
> Jon, this is a fairly serious problem with amanda. Why are you blaming the
> reporter instead of trying to fix the problem? You haven't even attempted
> to identify the problem, you're just being busy shooting the messenger.
*You* are the only one who can really identify the problem. Are you using
server-side or client-side estimates? If the latter, look at the
sendsize*debug for the 53GB dump to see what amanda thought the size would
be at estimate time.
> Nice approach.
When you come in with the attitude you are, expect nothing else.
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
|
|
|