Amanda-Users

Re: This is retarded.

2005-09-02 21:10:14
Subject: Re: This is retarded.
From: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17 AT duke DOT edu>
To: Joe Rhett <jrhett AT meer DOT net>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 20:50:21 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 at 3:00pm, Joe Rhett wrote

> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 05:06:37PM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> > *You* are the only one who can really identify the problem.  Are you using 
> > server-side or client-side estimates?  If the latter, look at the 
> > sendsize*debug for the 53GB dump to see what amanda thought the size would 
> > be at estimate time.
>  
> See the attached log except.  Amanda knew it was bigger than a tape, but
> backed it up anyway.

I'd be intereseted in seeing the sendsize*debug from the client and/or 
the relevant planner line from the amdump.N file.  Amanda didn't do a 
level 0 b/c it knew that was bigger than tapelength, but then the level 1 
turned out to be even bigger than the estimate for the level 0.  ??

-- 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>