BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install

2009-09-02 12:48:40
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install
From: "Jeffrey J. Kosowsky" <backuppc AT kosowsky DOT org>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:40:45 -0400
Tino Schwarze wrote at about 09:41:46 +0200 on Wednesday, September 2, 2009:
 > IMO the easiest approach would be:
 > - if BackupPC_nightly starts, it acquires a lock, then waits for backups
 >   to complete
 > - no new backups start until BackupPC_nightly finished
 > 
 > This should be rather easy since it could be implemented at the central
 > scheduling code - actually BackupPC_nightly wouldn't be started, just
 > the flag would be set that it wants to.
 > 
 > I would like such automatism (configurable, of course) as well since it
 > just sucks to guess backup periods and to keep some time reserved for
 > nightly maintenance.
 > 

I like this idea and I agree it would be easy to implement.
And by configurable, I assume you mean at a minimum the ability to
turn on/off this option.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/