BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install

2009-09-02 12:05:41
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install
From: James Ward <jeward AT torzo DOT com>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 08:58:27 -0700
I tried renicing everything:

jeward@kw157:/usr/share/backuppc/bin$ head -2 BackupPC_nightly
#!/usr/bin/perl
setpriority(0, $$, -20);

jeward@kw157:/usr/share/backuppc/bin$ head -2 BackupPC_dump
#!/usr/bin/perl
setpriority(0, $$, 20);

The result is, as some predicted, negligible.

Also, someone posited that maybe I am backing up more data and now  
sever capacity is insufficient, but that's not really the case.  One  
difference I did forget though was that I had broken the nightly jobs  
into quarters if I remember correctly.  So today, I told BackupPC to  
break the nightly jobs into 16ths.  That should help.  And then I'll  
slowly tighten the blackout window (up to 8 hours now) once I see how  
fast the smaller nightly jobs run.  My disk array is at %70 capacity,  
so I think it will be able to handle the increased disk space  
requirement of breaking the nightly jobs into 16ths.

Thanks for all the help an suggestions so far!

James

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>