Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install
2009-09-01 13:15:33
Les Mikesell wrote at about 11:46:42 -0500 on Tuesday, September 1, 2009:
> Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> > Steve wrote at about 12:02:32 -0400 on Tuesday, September 1, 2009:
> > > Is there a parameter that sets priority of once backup over another,
> > > or do all the BackupPC_dump processes start at the same level? Maybe
> > > that would be a $Conf that could be added...
> > > evets
> >
> > That sounds like an interesting suggestion.
> >
> > But for your purposes where it seems like you want to de-prioritize
> > all dumps relative to BackupPC_nightly, maybe just alias the relevant
> > commands in _InstallDir/bin to include the nice.
> >
>
> I don't think priorities will make much difference. This is much more
> about disk head position than CPU timeslices. If the nightly process
> runs at all it's going to keep yanking the head away from where the
> backup runs want it to be.
>
Well, then you could always wrap Backup_nightly in a script that
renices priorities of dump prices to 20 - but that is a certainly not
pretty and also that assumes that you are running nightly outside of
your backup window so that no new dumps start...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|