Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install
2009-09-02 12:37:17
You are correct on both counts.
On Sep 2, 2009, at 9:24 AM, Jon Craig wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:58 AM, James Ward<jeward AT torzo DOT com> wrote:
>> I tried renicing everything:
>>
>> jeward@kw157:/usr/share/backuppc/bin$ head -2 BackupPC_nightly
>> #!/usr/bin/perl
>> setpriority(0, $$, -20);
>>
>> jeward@kw157:/usr/share/backuppc/bin$ head -2 BackupPC_dump
>> #!/usr/bin/perl
>> setpriority(0, $$, 20);
>>
>
> I believe that BackupPC_nightly is running as "backuppc" user and as
> such can only reduce it priority (ie +20), not lower (ie -20). Also,
> you should check that the sub-processes to see if they properly
> inherited this change. My guess is it will still not have much affect
> as your most likely IO bound and priority affects scheduling on the
> processor, but doesn't prioritize IO.
> --
> Jonathan Craig
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008
> 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and
> focus on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, (continued)
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Tino Schwarze
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, James Ward
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Jon Craig
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Tino Schwarze
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install,
James Ward <=
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, James Ward
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Tino Schwarze
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Holger Parplies
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Les Mikesell
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Craig Barratt
Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Craig Barratt
|
|
|