Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install
2009-09-02 13:00:46
I third this suggestion.
On Sep 2, 2009, at 9:40 AM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> Tino Schwarze wrote at about 09:41:46 +0200 on Wednesday, September
> 2, 2009:
>> IMO the easiest approach would be:
>> - if BackupPC_nightly starts, it acquires a lock, then waits for
>> backups
>> to complete
>> - no new backups start until BackupPC_nightly finished
>>
>> This should be rather easy since it could be implemented at the
>> central
>> scheduling code - actually BackupPC_nightly wouldn't be started, just
>> the flag would be set that it wants to.
>>
>> I would like such automatism (configurable, of course) as well
>> since it
>> just sucks to guess backup periods and to keep some time reserved for
>> nightly maintenance.
>>
>
> I like this idea and I agree it would be easy to implement.
> And by configurable, I assume you mean at a minimum the ability to
> turn on/off this option.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008
> 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and
> focus on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, (continued)
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Tino Schwarze
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, James Ward
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Jon Craig
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Tino Schwarze
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, James Ward
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install,
James Ward <=
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Tino Schwarze
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Holger Parplies
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Les Mikesell
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
- Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Craig Barratt
Re: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install, Craig Barratt
|
|
|