On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:30:09 +0200, Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT 
com>  
wrote:

> You might want to consider having two backups, for different purposes.   
> Use a Windows full backup for disaster recovery and Full+Incremental  
> Bacula backups for per-file recovery.

We already have ADS for disaster recovery for W2K3, if it also supports  
W2K8 it would be a better idea. Or just plain dd as far as I'm concerned :)

The point is to integrate this into the regular Bacula framework and  
schedules, so I either need something like ntbackup which extends Bacula  
in just the right way or something that can completely replace it.

If it's just not possible for W2K8 maybe a different backup product is a  
better solution.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users