Amanda-Users

Re: NT backup

2003-12-23 20:48:21
Subject: Re: NT backup
From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
To: jblackburn AT hirzel DOT com
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 20:45:57 -0500
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 14:07, jessica blackburn wrote:
>hello again!
>
>i got the samba working so i can talk with the ms box.  now i'm
> trying to get the amanda win32 working to try and backup the
> system.  i am connecting to the MS box but i am getting an error
> that i can't seem to figure out when i'm running amcheck.
>
>
>-bash-2.05b$ /usr/sbin/amcheck DailySet1
>Amanda Tape Server Host Check
>-----------------------------
>Holding disk /var/tmp: 28918452 KB disk space available, that's
> plenty amcheck-server: slot 4: date 20031205 label DailySet103
> (exact label match)
>NOTE: skipping tape-writable test
>Tape DailySet103 label ok
>Server check took 0.320 seconds
>
>Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
>--------------------------------
>ERROR: NAK hccdevelop03: execute access to
>"/usr/amanda/libexec/selfcheck" denied
>Client check: 2 hosts checked in 0.135 seconds, 1 problem found
>
>the directory setup on the MS machine does not contain anything
> called selfcheck.  do i need this here or should it be running from
> my linux machine?  also, on my MS maching i do not have a folder
> under usr called lib.  again is this a problem.

Tisn't lib, its 'amanda/libexec',  as in $prefix/libexec/selfcheck, 
and it should be executable (I think, its a winderz box, & me not 
winderz expert) by amanda.  Go re-read the installation instructs for 
the win32 "client" version & dbl check it from the top down.  Aka, 
yes, its a problem :)

Here, on my only client, there isn't an 'amanda' in that path, just 
/usr/local/libexec/selfcheck etc.  There is also no firewall as its 
on the other side of the client machine here.

However, IIRC that would have been set in the configure that built 
that win32 client object, so its a no brainer as long as they 
actually match, or at least I'd assume that till informed otherwise.

>Thanks for all the help.  I'm just getting started with this and i
> tend to get stuck A LOT!!!
>
We all did the first time. :-)

>jess
>
>On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 17:33, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Monday 22 December 2003 15:52, jessica blackburn wrote:
>> >Hello!
>> >
>> >I'm trying to back up an NT file system using a Linux file
>> > system. I currently run amanda on my linux machine, however, i'm
>> > having numerous problems attempting to get the nt systems
>> > backed-up.  i've tried both the amanda win32 and the samba and
>> > cannot get either to work.  using samba i am able to look at the
>> > linux machine from the nt machine but i've been unsuccessful the
>> > other way.  when using the win32 i am getting the error host
>> > down and 1 problem found.
>> >
>> >any recommendations on which approach to take and how best to
>> > tackle this?
>> >
>> >any and all help is greatly appreciated!!
>> >
>> >thanks!
>> >
>> >jess
>> >
>> >Hirzel Canning Company
>> >Northwood, OH
>> >jblackburn AT hirzel DOT com
>>
>> I take it that you are not aware that the NT filesystem is rated
>> read only by the linux drivers?  I do not know if thats because
>> its such a moving target, or if doing the correct write things
>> requires using something patented by M$.
>>
>> However, I'd investigate the latest cifs, aka samba stuff, and see
>> if a bridge could be built using it.  Make sure you are using the
>> latest cifs release on the NT box, and the latest samba
>> 3.0something on the amanda server.  That might have a chance of
>> working.
>>
>> There is also another group whose name escapes me ATM, who have
>> had some success getting amanda as a client to work on windows
>> boxes, so you might want to investigate that route too.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>