Hi Rudolf

> If you want to avoid tape back hitching, you have to have atleast:
> HP LTO-5: 47 MB/s    IBM LTO-5: 40 MB/s
> HP LTO-6: 54 MB/s    IBM LTO-6: 40 MB/s
> ....
> And I am afraid, that single 6 TB drive is not a good solution. It
> can be maybe sufficient if you first  spool the data, and then just
> unspool them to the tape, or using D2D2T, but if you have spooling
> and unspooling at the same time, I do not think that it will
> be considerate to your tape drive.

Thanks for the numbers and pointing me to the spool/unspool problem. 
This can be fixed by using two hard drives, right?

The whole thing about costs probably seams to be a bit ridiculous, but 
unfortunately there is niter money nor understanding for the need here 
right now. So I'm trying to figure out a cheap way to get to a working 
system that can be handled somehow. And I'm fully aware of the fact that 
the hardware investment costs will be a minor part in the actual long 
term overall costs.

See you
Flo


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users