Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] volume/file size and speed

2010-05-11 13:53:06
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] volume/file size and speed
From: Joseph Spenner <joseph85750 AT yahoo DOT com>
To: bacula-users <Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 10:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
--- On Tue, 5/11/10, John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> wrote:


> I first must let bat (I think?) load the WHOLE index before
> I get a list of what is possible to select.  This is what
> appears to take hours.  Or is this possible faster in
> bconsole?
> >
> 
> I do not really use bat, nor have I restored anything from
> any version
> of bacula > 2.4, however in 2.4 the indexing takes few
> minutes for a
> few hundred thousand files on my 5 year old database server
> with a 28
> GB postgres catalog.
> 
> John
> 

Ok, I just used bconsole and recovered a directory in little time at all.  So, 
bat is the problem.  I can use bconsole instead.  I might try to go back to 
using 1TB files and see how it performs as well.
Thanks for the tip!



      

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users