Re: [Bacula-users] volume/file size and speed
2010-05-11 13:20:15
--- On Tue, 5/11/10, John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>
> > 3) If I use bconsole I can specify a single file to
> recover and it is VERY fast. But there doesn't seem to be
> a way to specify an entire directory. Or am I not looking
> in the right place?
> >
>
> You run restore and mark the folder you want to restore.
>
> John
>
Right, but in order to do this, I first must let bat (I think?) load the WHOLE
index before I get a list of what is possible to select. This is what appears
to take hours. Or is this possible faster in bconsole?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Bacula-users] volume/file size and speed, Joseph Spenner
- Re: [Bacula-users] volume/file size and speed, John Drescher
- Re: [Bacula-users] volume/file size and speed,
Joseph Spenner <=
- Re: [Bacula-users] volume/file size and speed, John Drescher
- Re: [Bacula-users] volume/file size and speed, Joseph Spenner
- Re: [Bacula-users] volume/file size and speed, Richard Scobie
- [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question, Joseph Spenner
- Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question, John Drescher
- Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question, Joseph Spenner
- Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question, Phil Stracchino
- Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question, Joseph Spenner
- Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question, Phil Stracchino
- Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question, Joseph Spenner
|
|
|