Re: [Bacula-users] volume/file size and speed
2010-05-11 13:33:56
> Right, but in order to do this, I first must let bat (I think?) load the
> WHOLE index before I get a list of what is possible to select. This is what
> appears to take hours. Or is this possible faster in bconsole?
>
I do not really use bat, nor have I restored anything from any version
of bacula > 2.4, however in 2.4 the indexing takes few minutes for a
few hundred thousand files on my 5 year old database server with a 28
GB postgres catalog.
John
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Bacula-users] volume/file size and speed, Joseph Spenner
- Re: [Bacula-users] volume/file size and speed, John Drescher
- Re: [Bacula-users] volume/file size and speed, Joseph Spenner
- Re: [Bacula-users] volume/file size and speed,
John Drescher <=
- Re: [Bacula-users] volume/file size and speed, Joseph Spenner
- Re: [Bacula-users] volume/file size and speed, Richard Scobie
- [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question, Joseph Spenner
- Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question, John Drescher
- Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question, Joseph Spenner
- Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question, Phil Stracchino
- Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question, Joseph Spenner
- Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question, Phil Stracchino
- Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question, Joseph Spenner
- Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question, Joseph Spenner
|
|
|