> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Stracchino [mailto:alaric AT metrocast DOT net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 5:53 AM
> To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Simplified pools
> 
> On 04/06/10 06:00, Kevin Keane wrote:
> > Your idea would solve very nicely solve one really ugly problem: when
> > manually running a backup job, the job may end up in the wrong pool -
> > even if you actually remembered to select the correct one. For
> > instance, let's say that the most recent Differential job failed. You
> > decide to re-run the job manually. Bacula is smart enough to upgrade
> > the job from Incremental to Differential automatically, but it is not
> > smart enough to move the job from the Incremental to the Differential
> > pool.
> 
> Actually, this is a problem which has largely been fixed in Bacula-3
> and later, by changing the way overrides work.

Really? I see this problem in bacula 3.0.3 all the time. Maybe I need to change 
something in my configuration to take advantage of this new feature. How is it 
supposed to work?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users