On 04/07/10 00:54, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Yeah, that works ... when you only need to control pools based on job level.
> 
> My problem is that sometimes I need to control other job attibutes, such
> as spooling, by job level.
> 
> The mechanism just needs to be generalised a little, so your above
> example becomes:
> 
> 
> JobDefs {
>   Name = Backup
>   Type = Backup
>   Level = Full
>   Full {
>     Pool = Full-Tape
>   }
>   Differential {
>     Pool = Diff-Disk
>   }
>   Incremental {
>     Pool = Incr-Disk
>   }
>   Schedule = "Monthly Rotation"
>   [...]
> }
> 
> ... or something like that, so other things may be overridden based on
> level.

This is a good suggestion, I think.  I'd go ahead and write it up and
submit it.  :)


-- 
  Phil Stracchino, CDK#2     DoD#299792458     ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
  alaric AT caerllewys DOT net   alaric AT metrocast DOT net   phil AT 
co.ordinate DOT org
         Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
                 It's not the years, it's the mileage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users