On 04/06/10 06:00, Kevin Keane wrote:
> Your idea would solve very nicely solve one really ugly problem: when
> manually running a backup job, the job may end up in the wrong pool -
> even if you actually remembered to select the correct one. For
> instance, let's say that the most recent Differential job failed. You
> decide to re-run the job manually. Bacula is smart enough to upgrade
> the job from Incremental to Differential automatically, but it is not
> smart enough to move the job from the Incremental to the Differential
> pool.

Actually, this is a problem which has largely been fixed in Bacula-3 and
later, by changing the way overrides work.


-- 
  Phil Stracchino, CDK#2     DoD#299792458     ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
  alaric AT caerllewys DOT net   alaric AT metrocast DOT net   phil AT 
co.ordinate DOT org
         Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
                 It's not the years, it's the mileage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users