On 21/01/2016 21:58, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
> 2016-01-21 11:44 GMT+01:00 Adam Goryachev <mailinglists AT 
> websitemanagers.com DOT au>:
>> Silly question but have you named the host full or the share full?
>> A lot of your logs that you posted seemed to have full as one of those
>> names. It could be confusing bpc and it's unlikely that anyone has
>> tested that scenario.
> Share is named "full" as point to the whole server.
> So, "Backup full" means that is backiung up the share "full" ? That makes 
> sense.
>
OK, I'd suggest to try changing this to something else. Usually I would 
backup / which obviously means the whole server (ie, root folder and 
everything under it). Though I also tend to specify to only backup the 
single filesystem to avoid backups of /proc or /sys and so on. So if you 
have multiple mount points, then you need to specify each one as a "share".

Are you using rsyncd as opposed to rsync? That is really the only method 
I can think of to have the "share name" not equal to a actual directory 
or path....

Regards,
Adam

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/