BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-19 11:12:06
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow
From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta AT gmail DOT com>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:10:39 +0100
2016-01-19 17:01 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>:
> I'd bump up FullKeepCntMin and IncrKeepCntMin to the numbers you want
> to see if that keeps them from being expired early.  I always did that
> with v3 too just in case something odd happened with the system clock
> and to keep backups after decommissioning a host.

Bumped Full to 3 (it was 1) and Incremental to 21 (it was 7)

But, at least for Full, this is a great waste of space.

> Also, since the convention for expiry parameters is
> "FullKeepPeriod/FullKeepCnt" etc refer to *Filled* backups, and
> "IncrKeepPeriod/IncrKeepCnt" refer to "Unfilled" backups if you change
> the scheduling you may need to adjust the FillCycle setting.

So, what do you suggest ? I would like to have 1 full every 30 days
and 1 incremental each day
being able to revert to each day up to full (30 days before)

I can also try with 1 full every 15 days, having 2 full each month,
but this will double the used space.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>