BackupPC-users

[BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install

2009-09-01 11:19:16
Subject: [BackupPC-users] 2.x behavior desired on 3.1 install
From: James Ward <jeward AT torzo DOT com>
To: "General list for user discussion, questions and support" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:16:18 -0700
All,

I'm reposting this as I evidently tried to steal a thread before.

Since upgrading a very busy BackupPC server to 3.1, it's been falling
farther and farther behind due to disk  contention between the nightly
admin jobs and backups which ran 24x7 on the 2.x set up.  I asked for
help here and the only suggestion I got was to carve out a window of
time for the admin jobs to run.  This is all well and good, but seems
very inefficient, and as I experiment with the settings, the server
continues to get further and further behind.  Is it possible to
replicate the 2.x behavior where backups stop, the admin jobs run, and
then backups start again?

James

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/