Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0
2006-03-15 17:16:57
Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 18:13 schrieb Paul Bijnens:
> On 2006-03-15 17:27, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > I don't think this is the problem, but I do not see a "record yes"
> > setting. I wonder if that is needed to ensure amanda knows when
> > the last full dump was done? It is needed for "dump", but I'm
> > uncertain about gnutar.
>
> I think you hit the nail right on the head.
> For gnutar, amanda uses the /etc/amandates files similar to
> the file /etc/dumpdates used by dump.
> If that file is empty, then amanda thinks it never did a level 0
> dump, and hence does it now.
> However, with "record no" that file is never updated either,
> resulting in always level 0 for those filesystems missing in the
> file.
>
I ran a "amadmin <config> disklist" right now and here is one example for the
disks I encountered many level 0 backups.
host springfield.edvz.sbg.ac.at:
interface default
disk /:
program "GNUTAR"
priority 1
dumpcycle 6
maxdumps 1
maxpromoteday 10000
strategy STANDARD
compress CLIENT BEST
comprate 0.50 0.50
auth BSD
kencrypt NO
holdingdisk YES
record YES
index YES
skip-incr NO
skip-full NO
Maybe you can tell me more with that. As I see, record is set to yes. But what
is "maxpromoteday"? Can I set how many days fulls can be promoted? The mail
reports tell me, that they get promoted.
Regards,
Thomas
> I have to time to try to this out, but I'm interested
> if this theory is correct.
--
*****************************************************************
* Thomas Widhalm Unix Administrator *
* University of Salzburg ITServices (ITS) *
* Systems Management Unix Systems *
* Hellbrunnerstr. 34 5020 Salzburg, Austria *
* widhalmt AT unix.sbg.ac DOT at +43/662/8044-6774 *
* gpg: 6265BAE6 *
* http://www.sbg.ac.at/zid/organisation/mitarbeiter/widhalm.htm *
*****************************************************************
pgpOWwdBcNjQ5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, (continued)
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Paul Bijnens
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0,
Thomas Widhalm <=
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Paul Bijnens
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Thomas Widhalm
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Paul Bijnens
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Thomas Widhalm
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Jon LaBadie
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Thomas Widhalm
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Gene Heskett
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Jon LaBadie
|
|
|