Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0
2006-03-15 11:31:51
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 09:45 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:03:51PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> > >
> > > Here are the 2 parts of the config:
> > >
> >
> > I took the liberty of deleting the comments and unneeded
> > tapetypes/dumptypes. 800 lines dropped to about 50.
> > Hope I did not drop anything significant to the discussion.
>
> So sorry. We had a lot of troubles migrating our other servers from
> legato to data protector, so I missed to clean the files before posting.
> I'm really ver sorry.
The amanda.conf file, as distributed, is heavily overloaded
with commentary and unused definitions. It seldom is cleaned up.
I was not admonishing your posting, just explaining what I did
in case there were errors in my editing.
> > Amazing how "simple" amanda.conf can become.
> >
> > I put two questions inline.
> >
> > ||
> > || Here are the 2 parts of the config:
> > ||
> > || first file:
> > || =====================
> > ||
> > || mailto "root"
> > || dumpuser "amanda"
> > || netusage 100000 Kbps
> > || maxdumps 1
> > ||
> > || bumpsize 10 Mb
> > || bumpdays 1
> > || bumpmult 4
> > ||
> > || etimeout 1800
> > ||
> > || runtapes 1
> > || reserve 0
> > ||
> > || define tapetype DEC-TZ89 {
> > || comment "DEC TZ89 (hardware compression on: Xmn)"
> > || length 29414 mbytes
> > || filemark 24 kbytes
> > || speed 1634 kps
> > || }
> > ||
> > || ======================
> > ||
> > || and the other:
> > ||
> > || ======================
> > ||
> > || org "IS"
> > ||
> > || inparallel 1
> > ||
> > || dumpcycle 8
> > || runspercycle 0
> > || tapecycle 4
> >
> > Not sure I understand this set of parameters.
> >
> > runspercycle == 0 causes all level 0 dumps I believe.
> > In that case the "length" of the dumpcycle is immaterial.
> > Each time you run amdump, everything will get full dumps.
>
> runspercycle = 0 means "same as tapecycle" as mentionend
> in another post here.
That was "me" in the other post. That is not what I wrote.
> If this is not correct (at least the docu says, it is correct)
> than please tell me. I want amanda to know that there is one
> run every day, despite of manual runs after fixing errors.
The docs (and I) said "same as dumpcycle". How soon I forget
even what I wrote and read. Must be a sign of senility. :(
I was thinking dumpcycle == 0 would cause all level 0 dumps.
With your settings it does suggest one run per day. Sorry.
I know you are not using tape now, but whenever you run
amcheck (you do don't right?) it will complain tapecycle
less than runspercycle.
> >
> > Are you saying you plan to run amdump once each 8 days
> > and that you want only level 0 dumps each run?
> >
> > And further, you will rotate 4 tapes totaling 32 days
> > of backups available?
>
> I removed all tapes from the config. I just save to the holding disk. I
> can live with the daily "tape error", but I want amanda to do less full
> backups.
>
The general way to reduce full dump frequency is increase dumpcycle.
If that doesn't help then perhaps other factors are coming into play.
For example, amanda will promote a very active DLE thinking so much
has changed the savings of a level 1 aren't worth it, lets just do
another level 0.
Sometimes an activity on your computer will make it seem like things
have changed when they have not. I believe gnutar relies heavily
on the ctime parameter of unix files. Some activities affect ctime
and could make it look like the file changes (ex. moving a file).
Other than that I don't see any reason you are not getting higher
number levels on your holding disk. I certainly do on a new setup
I'm testing but not providing any tapes.
I don't think this is the problem, but I do not see a "record yes"
setting. I wonder if that is needed to ensure amanda knows when
the last full dump was done? It is needed for "dump", but I'm
uncertain about gnutar.
> >
> > ||
> > || holdingdisk hd1 {
> > || comment "main holding disk for IS"
> > || directory "/data/amanda/IS"
> > || use -1
> > || chunksize 2 Gb
> > || }
> > ||
> > ||
> > || tapedev "/dev/null"
> > || tapetype DEC-TZ89
> >
> > Is your DEC tapedrive really attached to the null device?
> > Doesn't work very well that way does it? :))
>
> It is disconnected from the server as it produced some driver problems
> recently. So we switched to backup to the holdingsdisk.
>
> >
> >
> > || labelstr "^IS[0-9][0-9]*$"
> > ||
> > || infofile "/var/lib/amanda/IS/curinfo"
> > || logdir "/var/lib/amanda/IS"
> > || indexdir "/var/lib/amanda/IS/index"
> > ||
> > || includefile "/etc/amanda/amanda-shared.conf"
> > ||
> > || ===================
> > ||
> > || the first file is used by all configs. The second one is one specific
> > || config.
> > ||
> >
> --
>>> End of included message <<<
--
Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com
JG Computing
4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159
Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, (continued)
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Thomas Widhalm
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Thomas Widhalm
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Gene Heskett
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Thomas Widhalm
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Jon LaBadie
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Thomas Widhalm
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0,
Jon LaBadie <=
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Thomas Widhalm
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Jon LaBadie
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Paul Bijnens
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Paul Bijnens
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Thomas Widhalm
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Paul Bijnens
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Thomas Widhalm
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Stefan G. Weichinger
|
|
|