Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0
2006-03-15 12:26:01
Paul Bijnens schrieb:
> On 2006-03-15 17:27, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>>
>> I don't think this is the problem, but I do not see a "record yes"
>> setting. I wonder if that is needed to ensure amanda knows when
>> the last full dump was done? It is needed for "dump", but I'm
>> uncertain about gnutar.
>
> I think you hit the nail right on the head.
> For gnutar, amanda uses the /etc/amandates files similar to
> the file /etc/dumpdates used by dump.
> If that file is empty, then amanda thinks it never did a level 0
> dump, and hence does it now.
> However, with "record no" that file is never updated either,
> resulting in always level 0 for those filesystems missing in the
> file.
>
> I have to time to try to this out, but I'm interested
> if this theory is correct.
Sounds very reasonable, combined with that "reserve"-value ...
Stefan.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, (continued)
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Paul Bijnens
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0,
Stefan G. Weichinger <=
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Thomas Widhalm
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Paul Bijnens
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Thomas Widhalm
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Paul Bijnens
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Thomas Widhalm
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Jon LaBadie
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Thomas Widhalm
- Re: backup just on holding disks makes many level 0, Gene Heskett
|
|
|