Amanda-Users

Re: Using amrecover - strange happenings

2005-09-29 21:33:09
Subject: Re: Using amrecover - strange happenings
From: Steve H <big_dog_steve AT yahoo DOT com>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
I am on a Red Hat 9 box.  Pervious tar verion was 1.13, just upgraded to 1.15
and it didn't fix the issue. What do you mean by indexing DLE?

Thanks,
Steve

--- Vera <dobryanskaya AT adelphia DOT net> wrote:

> I do not remember exactly what was a reason for this error, but I saw it 
> before :-)
> 
> 1. Are you indexing this DLE?
> 2. What OS are you using? FC3 distributive had tar 1.14 with a bug - > check 
> the amrecover log file and if error happens at the "tar" point, then simple 
> upgrade your tar RPM or reinstall it from sources
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steve H" <big_dog_steve AT yahoo DOT com>
> To: <amanda-users AT amanda DOT org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 5:42 PM
> Subject: Using amrecover - strange happenings
> 
> 
> > Guys,
> >
> >   I would appreciate some help with this one, as it's freaking me out.  I 
> > have
> > been getting backups for a while now of a particular host and file system. 
> > I
> > have tested the recovery before and it worked great.
> >   This time, I put the necessary tape in, and run amrecover and it will 
> > only
> > restore the directories.  The files will not restore, and I keep getting 
> > the
> > error:
> >
> > ./laptopBackups/Documents and Settings/My Documents/
> > tar: Unexpected EOF in archive
> > tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
> > extract_list - child returned non-zero status: 2
> > Continue [?/Y/n]?
> >
> > so I started looking at the actual index for that and their are no files 
> > listed
> > in the index, only directories.
> >
> > I started checking the dates, and it seems like the directories have been
> > backed up, and they all have the same date of backup, but the actual 
> > documents
> > have a different date.  It's like they were backed up once, but never got
> > backed up again.
> >
> > Does this have to do with the tape rotation?  what am I missing?  I have 
> > the
> > tape that lists the documents, and it even lists them when I browse the 
> > tape
> > with amrecover, but I can't extract them, I get the error above.
> >
> > Please help,
> > Steve
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> > http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 



                
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com