Re: AMLABEL
2005-02-20 18:58:46
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 11:24, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:04:40AM +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
>> Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> >With the ultrium it is less important about considering HW or SW
>> >compression. But be aware that on Solaris whether HW compression
>> >is turned on or not is determined by the device you choose. You
>> >will find lots of /dev/rmt/0"xyz" devices. The "xyz" determines
>> >the properties of the device the driver will set upon opening it.
>> >
>> >Don't be fooled into assumptions about the various devices. The
>> >"c" device is listed as "compressed". But that is the
>> > conventional use. There is no certainty that it turns
>> > compression on for every device, or that devices without the "c"
>> > are no compression. You will even have a "c" device for drives
>> > that are not capable of HW compression ;-) Only way to tell is
>> > check the docs for the drive and settings for the driver. And
>> > then I'd check it if I could.
>>
>> Indeed.
>>
>> And check the file st.init, where the letters get their meaning.
>
>Paul, I'm unfamiliar with the file st.init.
>Nor do I find one on my system.
>Did you mean the st.conf file in /kernel/drv?
>
>If the st.conf file, I don't find an entries for any lto's I
>recognize. One poster said it was "builtin" to the driver,
>another said they had to edit the file and add an entry.
>
>The drive docs would probably still be needed to interpret
>the entry.
Paul: That file (st.init/st.conf) doesn't exist on a redhat flavored
linux install. Nor on a debian sarge based install of BDI-4.08, I
just checked that one too.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.33% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
|
|
|