Amanda-Users

Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk

2005-02-17 04:25:24
Subject: Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert AT linux-m68k DOT org>
To: Kevin Dalley <kevin AT kelphead DOT org>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:14:35 +0100 (CET)
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Kevin Dalley wrote:
> Disadvantages
> 
> The primary disadvantage is the need for a holding disk which can
> handle roughly twice the size of the tape, though I can get away with
> slightly less space than this.

And since your data is put on tape with one day delay, there's a bigger risk of
lost data due to a broken holding disk, right?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                                                Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert AT linux-m68k 
DOT org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                                            -- Linus Torvalds