Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk
2005-02-15 21:45:49
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 01:12:11PM +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>
> Since re-reading the manpage, thanks to some advice here, I've increased
> runtapes to 2, which I think will solve this. I didn't realise that it was
> an upper limit rather than an absolute, although I'm still unconvinced that
> Amanda will continue to use only one tape except in this extreme case; we'll
> see in the next week how well it goes.
Just a point of example; I've had runtapes 3 for about 2 years but very
few days exceed 1 tape. Where it helps me is when I'm lazy and forget
to change the tape magazine and let several, or a week's worth, of
dumps build on the holding disk. When I finally change the magazine
and run amflush, amanda will use up to 3 tapes. If runtapes were 1,
then I'd have to do many amflushes.
--
Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com
JG Computing
4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159
Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
|
|
|