Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk

Subject:	Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk
From:	Jamie Wilkinson <jaq AT spacepants DOT org>
To:	amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date:	Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:51:11 +1100

This one time, at band camp, Frank Smith wrote:
>After further thought I believe Alex was correct about the
>scheduler limiting itself to what will fit, so increasing
>runtapes to 2 should let you get incrementals of everthing
>on the day the full of your big DLE occurs.

I'm not seeing a post by Alex in this thread; can you perhaps help out my
poor brain with a URL?

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Jamie Wilkinson Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Frank Smith Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Jamie Wilkinson Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Frank Smith Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Jean-Louis Martineau Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Brian Cuttler Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Eric Siegerman Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Jamie Wilkinson <= Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Frank Smith Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Jamie Wilkinson Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Gene Heskett Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Gene Heskett Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Jamie Wilkinson Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Gene Heskett Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Jamie Wilkinson Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Jon LaBadie Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Kevin Dalley Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk, Geert Uytterhoeven