Amanda-Users

Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk

2005-02-15 20:11:32
Subject: Re: forcing skipped incrementals into holding disk
From: Jamie Wilkinson <jaq AT spacepants DOT org>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:58:06 +1100
This one time, at band camp, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> In general, we only need one LTO1 a day, this particular DLE is a
>>> freak statistic well outside the standard deviations of the other
>>> DLE sizes, so doing a flush once every cycle is more appealing
>>> than allocating two tapes per run.
>
>Can you, by using tar, break that dle up into smaller pieces?  This 
>will aid amanda quite a bit in arriving at a schedule thats usable.

See below :-)

>>> At this stage, splitting this DLE into smaller chunks is also not
>>> an option, in case you were wondering.
>>
>>That would have been the next suggestion.
>
>It still is. :-)

Suggestion noted.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>