Re: wasted action of taper
2003-05-16 05:43:48
Eric Siegerman wrote:
> Yah. I've been thinking that it might turn into another kind of
> custom block like tapetype and dumptype. Something like:
> algorithm algo1 {
> algo 1 stuff
> }
> algorithm algo2 {
> algo 2 stuff
> }
>
> taper_algorithms algo1 algo2
[...]
I'd just like to comment that I find this idea very appealing in its
flexibility and legibility. I believe that with just a few options, one
could fine-tune an installation relatively easily.
Alex
--
Alexander Jolk / BUF Compagnie
tel +33-1 42 68 18 28 / fax +33-1 42 68 18 29
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: wasted action of taper, (continued)
- Re: wasted action of taper, Eric Siegerman
- Re: wasted action of taper, Joshua Baker-LePain
- Re: wasted action of taper, Gene Heskett
- Re: wasted action of taper, Paul Bijnens
- Re: wasted action of taper, Eric Siegerman
- Re: wasted action of taper,
Alexander JOLK <=
- Re: wasted action of taper, Paul Bijnens
- Re: wasted action of taper, Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: wasted action of taper, Joshua Baker-LePain
- Re: wasted action of taper, Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: wasted action of taper, Jon LaBadie
- Re: wasted action of taper, Joshua Baker-LePain
- Re: wasted action of taper, Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: wasted action of taper, Gene Heskett
- Re: wasted action of taper, Jon LaBadie
- Re: wasted action of taper, Eric Siegerman
|
|
|