Amanda-Users

Re: wasted action of taper

2003-05-16 06:06:04
Subject: Re: wasted action of taper
From: Paul Bijnens <paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 11:56:18 +0200
Alexander JOLK wrote:

Eric Siegerman wrote:
Yah.  I've been thinking that it might turn into another kind of
custom block like tapetype and dumptype.  Something like:
       algorithm algo1 {
               algo 1 stuff
       }
       algorithm algo2 {
               algo 2 stuff
       }

       taper_algorithms algo1 algo2
[...]

I'd just like to comment that I find this idea very appealing in its
flexibility and legibility.  I believe that with just a few options, one
could fine-tune an installation relatively easily.


And it lowers the need for splitting dump across tapes even more.
Or should we implement splitting dumps accross tapes first,
making this taper tuning less needed?

--
Paul Bijnens, Xplanation                            Tel  +32 16 397.511
Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUM    Fax  +32 16 397.512
http://www.xplanation.com/          email:  Paul.Bijnens AT xplanation DOT com
***********************************************************************
* I think I've got the hang of it now:  exit, ^D, ^C, ^\, ^Z, ^Q, F6, *
* quit,  ZZ, :q, :q!,  M-Z, ^X^C,  logoff, logout, close, bye,  /bye, *
* stop, end, F3, ~., ^]c, +++ ATH, disconnect, halt,  abort,  hangup, *
* PF4, F20, ^X^X, :D::D, KJOB, F14-f-e, F8-e,  kill -1 $$,  shutdown, *
* kill -9 1,  Alt-F4,  Ctrl-Alt-Del,  AltGr-NumLock,  Stop-A,  ...    *
* ...  "Are you sure?"  ...   YES   ...   Phew ...   I'm out          *
***********************************************************************




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>