Re: wasted action of taper
2003-05-16 07:21:44
On Fri, 16 May 2003 at 7:10am, Mitch Collinsworth wrote
> Oh, and for the record, if it's one or the other, my vote would be for
> tape chunking to be implemented first.
I'd have to agree with Mitch here. Unless the new taperalgo options
include one that says "wait until something gets dumped that fits", they
won't help somebody like me who uses LARGESTFIT.
And, as Mitch mentioned, spanning and simultaneous dump/taping are rather
desirable features.
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: wasted action of taper, (continued)
- Re: wasted action of taper, Eric Siegerman
- Re: wasted action of taper, Joshua Baker-LePain
- Re: wasted action of taper, Gene Heskett
- Re: wasted action of taper, Paul Bijnens
- Re: wasted action of taper, Eric Siegerman
- Re: wasted action of taper, Alexander JOLK
- Re: wasted action of taper, Paul Bijnens
- Re: wasted action of taper, Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: wasted action of taper,
Joshua Baker-LePain <=
- Re: wasted action of taper, Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: wasted action of taper, Jon LaBadie
- Re: wasted action of taper, Joshua Baker-LePain
- Re: wasted action of taper, Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: wasted action of taper, Gene Heskett
- Re: wasted action of taper, Jon LaBadie
- Re: wasted action of taper, Eric Siegerman
RE: wasted action of taper, donald . ritchey
|
|
|