Re: wasted action of taper
2003-05-16 11:14:28
On Fri, 16 May 2003 at 11:02am, Jon LaBadie wrote
> BTW in practice, doesn't the existing parallelism of amanda pretty much
> eliminate the time-saving benefits that these proposals might realize?
> Taping of completed DLE's goes on while my large DLE's complete and other
> DLE's dump while my large DLE's tape.
If you have a wide enough disparity in DLE sizes (as I do), taper can sit
idle a fair bit, especially towards the end of the amdump.
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: wasted action of taper, (continued)
- Re: wasted action of taper, Joshua Baker-LePain
- Re: wasted action of taper, Gene Heskett
- Re: wasted action of taper, Paul Bijnens
- Re: wasted action of taper, Eric Siegerman
- Re: wasted action of taper, Alexander JOLK
- Re: wasted action of taper, Paul Bijnens
- Re: wasted action of taper, Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: wasted action of taper, Joshua Baker-LePain
- Re: wasted action of taper, Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: wasted action of taper, Jon LaBadie
- Re: wasted action of taper,
Joshua Baker-LePain <=
- Re: wasted action of taper, Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: wasted action of taper, Gene Heskett
- Re: wasted action of taper, Jon LaBadie
- Re: wasted action of taper, Eric Siegerman
RE: wasted action of taper, donald . ritchey
|
|
|