Amanda-Users

Re: wasted action of taper

2003-05-16 11:14:28
Subject: Re: wasted action of taper
From: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17 AT duke DOT edu>
To: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 11:10:28 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 16 May 2003 at 11:02am, Jon LaBadie wrote

> BTW in practice, doesn't the existing parallelism of amanda pretty much
> eliminate the time-saving benefits that these proposals might realize?
> Taping of completed DLE's goes on while my large DLE's complete and other
> DLE's dump while my large DLE's tape.

If you have a wide enough disparity in DLE sizes (as I do), taper can sit 
idle a fair bit, especially towards the end of the amdump.

-- 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>