Re: amandad without xinetd

Subject:	Re: amandad without xinetd
From:	David Raistrick <drais AT wow.atlasta DOT net>
To:	"Kang, James" <jkang AT bnl DOT gov>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:30:26 -0800 (PST)

On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Kang, James wrote:

> They don't want to run xinetd.
> Is amandad capable of running "stand-alone" mode?

No.


---
david raistrick
drais AT atlasta DOT net                http://www.expita.com/nomime.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
amandad without xinetd, Kang, James Re: amandad without xinetd, Gene Heskett RE: amandad without xinetd, Kang, James Re: amandad without xinetd, Kang, James Re: amandad without xinetd, Gene Heskett Re: amandad without xinetd, Kang, James Re: amandad without xinetd, Martin Hepworth Re: amandad without xinetd, Gene Heskett Re: amandad without xinetd, David Raistrick <= Re: amandad without xinetd, Gene Heskett Re: amandad without xinetd, Gene Heskett Re: amandad without xinetd, Toomas Aas Re: amandad without xinetd, Gene Heskett

Previous by Date:	Re: Strange error with tape device., Paul Bijnens
Next by Date:	Re: amandad without xinetd, Gene Heskett
Previous by Thread:	Re: amandad without xinetd, Gene Heskett
Next by Thread:	Re: amandad without xinetd, Gene Heskett
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]