Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar

2016-03-20 14:47:30
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar
From: Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk AT bmrb.wisc DOT edu>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 13:43:39 -0500
On 2016-03-19 14:41, Phil Stracchino wrote:

> What's the best way to handle a removable-cartridge-drive technology
> like RDX in Bacula -- use the virtual changer...?

"Without vchanger, Bacula has no right to claim it supports disk-based 
backup". Vchanger is the only way to fly.

LTO-6: ~$11/TB
Seagate 8TB "archive" SATA drive: ~$28/TB
RDX: ~$100/TB

The drive: $2K for LTO vs $200 for RDX vs $20 for SATA.

Dima


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>