Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar

2016-03-10 18:41:43
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar
From: "compdoc" <compdoc AT hotrodpc DOT com>
To: "'bacula-users'" <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:35:39 -0700
> Given LTO-4 can do 120MB/s, yeah, 94 is good enough

Be sure to disable compression. I think I have it disabled two places, on Dir 
and well as on the SD. 

I built a low-power, mini-itx system to house an LTO-4 drive. The controller is 
an LSI LSI20320IE Ultra320. All backup data is over the lan. 

This is my last Windows backup. No spooling:


  Elapsed time:           6 hours 13 mins 54 secs
  Priority:               10
  FD Files Written:       218,515
  SD Files Written:       218,515
  FD Bytes Written:       610,852,830,755 (610.8 GB)
  SD Bytes Written:       610,902,766,901 (610.9 GB)
  Rate:                   27228.9 KB/s
  Software Compression:   None
  Snapshot/VSS:           yes
  Encryption:             no




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785111&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users