Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar
2016-03-17 09:21:11
Alan Brown wrote (2016/03/17):
> Caveat: BDXL is up to 120GB per disc (quad layer) and It _may_ be worth
> investigating this format for backups, but bacula doesn't play nicely
> with optical media.
>
> HVD development (6TB per disc) was abandoned in 2008. Ritek demonstrated
> 250GB BDXL discs (10 layer) 8 years ago but they've never been marketed.
> Ditto with Pioneer's 400GB BDXL format and the "1TB Blueray" disk is now
> 4 years past proposed launch date. What's killed all these "smaller"
> formats is cheap(ish) HDD/SSDs, cloud storage and the likes of Netflix.
> That's despite even BDXL 120GB not being large enough capacity to hold a
> complete 4k video title.
I think that two main killers for all these optical things for data
storage are unbelief in reliability (or simply unreliability) and
slooowness.
--
Rudolf Cejka <cejkar at fit.vutbr.cz> http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar
Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology
Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, (continued)
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Heitor Faria
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Dan Langille
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Kern Sibbald
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Dan Langille
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Simon Templar
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Dan Langille
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Alan Brown
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Heitor Faria
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Dan Langille
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Alan Brown
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar,
Cejka Rudolf <=
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Josh Fisher
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Phil Stracchino
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Kern Sibbald
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Josh Fisher
- [Bacula-users] Bacula with RDX, Heitor Faria
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula with RDX, Heitor Faria
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Dimitri Maziuk
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Phil Stracchino
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Dan Langille
- Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar, Cejka Rudolf
|
|
|