Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar
2016-03-14 11:03:14
Subject: |
Re: [Bacula-users] Copy disk to tape is 4x slower than tar |
From: |
Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk> |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:00:23 +0000 |
On 13/03/16 21:48, Dan Langille wrote:
>> As well as increasing max file size you need to boost the tape buffer size
>> from the 64kB default. I use 2MB
> This is a hardware setting?
No, it's a bacula-sd setting
> I tried Minimum block size & Maximum block size on my tape drive, but need to
> try it again.
>
My settings:
Spool Directory = /var/bacula/spool/TAPE
Maximum File Size = 16G
Maximum Network Buffer Size = 262144
Maximum block size = 2M
Maximum Spool Size = 220G
Maximum Job Spool Size = 32G
Don't touch minimum block size. It's fine as it is.
2MB is the maximum allowable in bacula, however you probably won't see
much speed improvement past 500kB unless there's compressible data in
the train (it's faster, but only a little. I use it because I have tight
backup windows and a lot of data to deal with)
FWIW Most LTO tape drives have 8MB(IBM) or 16MB(HP) write buffers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|