On May 1, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Alexander E. Fischer <aef AT raxys DOT net> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> when I first noticed that the Bareos fork has implemented storage to
> storage copy jobs I wanted to use that because it would make a lot of
> sense for my backup scenario. Only after spending quite a lot of time I
> found out that my problems regarding Bareos' storage to storage copy
> jobs seem to be related to having TLS enabled for all communications. I
> think their implementation just doesn't work for TLS and is therefore
> completely unusable to me.
> 
> As Bacula has an comparable feature now as well, and getting that
> version to run on all of my systems will be quite some work as well, I
> would like to know if Bacula 7's storage to storage copy jobs actually
> work nicely with TLS, before trying to set it all up. Has anyone
> first-hand knowledge about this? What do the developers say about this?

Have you tried it?  I’m still on 5 for at least a few weeks.  SD to SD is 
something I want to do too.

-- 
Dan Langille - http://langille.org

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
• 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
• Requirements for releasing software faster
• Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users