Re: [Bacula-users] Storage to storage copy jobs using TLS

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/10/2014 01:23 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On May 9, 2014, at 7:13 PM, Alexander E. Fischer <aef AT raxys DOT net> wrote:
>
>> On Fr, 2014-05-09 at 18:42 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>>> On May 1, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Alexander E. Fischer <aef AT raxys DOT net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> when I first noticed that the Bareos fork has implemented storage to
>>>> storage copy jobs I wanted to use that because it would make a lot of
>>>> sense for my backup scenario. Only after spending quite a lot of time I
>>>> found out that my problems regarding Bareos' storage to storage copy
>>>> jobs seem to be related to having TLS enabled for all communications. I
>>>> think their implementation just doesn't work for TLS and is therefore
>>>> completely unusable to me.
>>>>
>>>> As Bacula has an comparable feature now as well, and getting that
>>>> version to run on all of my systems will be quite some work as well, I
>>>> would like to know if Bacula 7's storage to storage copy jobs actually
>>>> work nicely with TLS, before trying to set it all up. Has anyone
>>>> first-hand knowledge about this? What do the developers say about this?
>>>
>>> Have you tried it? I?m still on 5 for at least a few weeks. SD to SD is something I want to do too.
>
>> Sorry I didn't test it in Bacula because Bareos supplied a fix in their
>> experimental builds and that one works now with TLS.
>>
>> I have no idea if it also works with Bacula but I can't really try
>> because Debian won't provide packages of the current Bacula version for
>> quite a long time and I really don't want to build it by myself on every
>> machine or package it by myself. Would be great if Bacula provided
>> packages for Debian like Bareos does, or did I just miss them?
>
> Who did the Debian packages in previous versions. This is really where the community has to step forward. The developers can?t be expected to do everything.
>
> e.g. the FreeBSD package is done by myself, not Bacula.
Yes, bravo, many thanks. Any you have been doing so for a *very* long time! :-)

Kern
>
>
> disclosure: yeah, I?m a Bacula developer and the FreeBSD version is still on 5.x and I hope to change that in the next few weeks.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
>  3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
>  Requirements for releasing software faster
>  Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlNtwJMACgkQNgfoSvWqwEjpwQCg1lFjubdU8NrnXVfuE/Cc5NKF
9o4An0pVMKWgR6WUof9oae3UPu7mfhHO
=+b4O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
&#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
&#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
&#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users