Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.0.1 and db issues - please, share your experience

2010-04-13 13:38:19
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.0.1 and db issues - please, share your experience
From: Thomas Mueller <thomas AT chaschperli DOT ch>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:36:07 +0000 (UTC)
Am Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:59:25 +0200 schrieb Koldo Santisteban:

> thanks for your answer.
>  The first stage was with mysql 5.0.77, and works with bacula 3.0.3
>  without
> problems. I have used the same database and server with bacula 5.0.1.
> The bacula server + DB is a 3,5 Gb Ram with a Xeon processor. I have
> tested my environment installing postgree on the same server and with a
> empty db. I create full bacula server backup and then try to restore. I
> have detected that the restore process works fine usgin bweb and bacula
> 5.0.1, what is the difference between bat and bweb?

noticed too, bat takes forever on building trees on restores. bconsole is 
_much_ faster.

- Thomas


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>