On 16/03/2010 15:33, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 03/16/10 11:09, John Drescher wrote:
>> On 03/16/10 10:30, Rodrigo Fernandes wrote:
>>> My backup server has the bacula version 2.4.4-1 installed via tar.gz in a
>>> Red Hat Enterprise Server 5.4 x86_64
>>
>> You should really upgrade to 5.0.1 if possible.
>
> Yes, agreed.  Unfortunately, 5.0.1 is not yet readily available on all
> platforms except by building from source.  I was looking at this the
> other day to see whether it was feasible yet to upgrade all of my
> machines, and finding that (for example) Debian and Ubuntu *still* have
> no stable packages newer than 2.4.4-b1, although there are unstable
> Bacula-5 .debs
5.0.1 transitioned into the Debian testing (squeeze) release on the 14th 
March. That is reported as being available for most (all?) supported 
Debian platforms.
In addition it seems that 5.0.1 is now available in lenny-backports.


http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=bacula&searchon=names&suite=all&section=all

I haven't checked Ubuntu recently but now it is available in backports 
I'm going to start testing/moving over to 5.0.x on my setup.

Regards

Richard

and Gentoo has nothing newer than 3.0.3 even in unstable.
>   It seems to be an uphill struggle to keep all the various OS
> distributions up to date on Bacula.
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users