On 03/16/10 11:09, John Drescher wrote:
> On 03/16/10 10:30, Rodrigo Fernandes wrote:
>> My backup server has the bacula version 2.4.4-1 installed via tar.gz in a
>> Red Hat Enterprise Server 5.4 x86_64
> 
> You should really upgrade to 5.0.1 if possible.

Yes, agreed.  Unfortunately, 5.0.1 is not yet readily available on all
platforms except by building from source.  I was looking at this the
other day to see whether it was feasible yet to upgrade all of my
machines, and finding that (for example) Debian and Ubuntu *still* have
no stable packages newer than 2.4.4-b1, although there are unstable
Bacula-5 .debs and Gentoo has nothing newer than 3.0.3 even in unstable.
 It seems to be an uphill struggle to keep all the various OS
distributions up to date on Bacula.


-- 
  Phil Stracchino, CDK#2     DoD#299792458     ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
  alaric AT caerllewys DOT net   alaric AT metrocast DOT net   phil AT 
co.ordinate DOT org
         Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
                 It's not the years, it's the mileage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users