Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection
2016-05-20 13:04:39
Exactly. Nothing you can do to prevent baseless lawsuits, only make the case against them harder and hopefully not worth the financial risk.
SCO is probably the best example of the worst case scenario from a financial perspective. As you say, BackupPC doesn't have a value that would make it worthwhile target.
David
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j _______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection, (continued)
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection,
David Cramblett <=
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection, Richard Alloway
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection, David Cramblett
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection, Stefan Peter
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection, David Cramblett
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection, Adam Goryachev
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection, David Cramblett
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection, Iain Hallam
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection, Stefan Peter
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection, Les Mikesell
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection, Stefan Peter
|
|
|