BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection

2016-05-19 19:29:05
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection
From: David Cramblett <david AT functionalchaos DOT net>
To: s_peter AT swissonline DOT ch
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 16:28:07 -0700
Stefan - Based on all this discussion, is your recommendation the GPL lic alone is enough, and we don't need anything additional?


All - Does anyone know what the situation is with this Zamanda site http://backuppc.com/ ?

David



On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Stefan Peter <s_peter AT swissonline DOT ch> wrote:
Dear David Cramblett

On 19.05.2016 23:59, David Cramblett wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Stefan Peter <s_peter AT swissonline DOT ch
> <mailto:s_peter AT swissonline DOT ch>> wrote:
>
>     On 19.05.2016 19:01, David Cramblett wrote:
>     > Yeah, or "CofO", or "Sign-Off", or whatever term folks feel the most
>     > comfortable with. It doesn't have to be "CLA", it could be whatever make
>     > since. Just something protecting the project from the unlikely "evil
>     > company scenario".
>
>     Sorry, but I seem to have missed something. What "evil company" scenario
>     exactly do you talk about?
>
>
> We're talking about a scenario where an individual submits code to the
> project while working for "abc company", who later says they own the
> copyright of the code and not the individual.

So what? In order to "capture" the project and make it their own, they
would have to get the consent of all other copyright holders
(contributors). Unless you actually introduce this CLA and the "enemy"
company manages to get hold of it, you have nothing to fear.

The worst that can happen is that the new copyright holder wants to
retrieve his contribution. So you remove the individuals code and
replace it with independent, fresh code from another contributor. But I
have never heard of an event like this and I'm not sure if it actually
is possible to retract a license. And whatever company actually would
try to get off a stunt like this would probably be taken to the internet
sponger so fast they would not survive it.


With kind regards

Stefan Peter

--
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
(See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style for details)



--
David Cramblett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/