On 05/20 01:18 , Stefan Peter wrote:
> The worst that can happen is that the new copyright holder wants to
> retrieve his contribution. So you remove the individuals code and
> replace it with independent, fresh code from another contributor. But I
> have never heard of an event like this and I'm not sure if it actually
> is possible to retract a license. And whatever company actually would
> try to get off a stunt like this would probably be taken to the internet
> sponger so fast they would not survive it.

The experience with Linux and SCO serves as something of a cautionary tale.
Even if the cause is groundless, there's a lot of hassle possible when
someone decides you're a worthwhile target.

OTOH, if BackupPC (however you define it) has no money, there's really not
much reason for lawyers to go after it. So this risk becomes more of an
issue if/when BPC becomes 'successful'.

-- 
Carl Soderstrom
Systems Administrator
Real-Time Enterprises
www.real-time.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/