BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

2016-05-13 11:44:55
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4
From: Juergen Harms <juergen.harms AT unige DOT ch>
To: <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 17:44:13 +0200
On 05/13/2016 03:04 PM, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
> We*NEED*  to move beyond v3.3.1/4.0.0pre, otherwise bitrot will disgregate 
> this nice Project.

"Bitrot": I agree - the only question is whether in n or in n+5 years. 
"It is a nice project": I dont agree - it is much more, it offers so 
much more than any of the alternatives that are around, letting it decay 
to rot should not happen.

Can this list organize itself to resume the minimum of activity that is 
necessary to keep BackupPC alive? is the necessary competence on board? 
Personally, I am willing to contribute, but lack many of the skills that 
are needed (and given my age am only of very temporary use). What is a 
minimum set of workitems to be picked up? repo management is clearly 
only the first one

I am not worried about my email and its unrelated subject - that topic 
is trivial - I used it as an illustration and to be provocative.

Juergen

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>