Re: [BackupPC-users] first "full" never completes
2011-09-03 00:18:36
Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com> wrote on 09/02/2011
11:05:22 PM:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at
5:03 PM, <hansbkk AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> > I've now tried to uninstall/re-install twice times without success.
> > Apparently the failure of the hardlink test during the postinstall
also
> > prevented the creation of the default config.pl and hosts files.
> >
> > This time I'm planning to delete the backuppc user as well as:
> >
> > /var/lib/backuppc
> > /etc/backuppc
> > /var/log/backuppc
> > /usr/share/backuppc
>
> None of that should be necessary.
But would probably be a very good idea.
What would be an even better idea would be to grab a spare PC (or
a virtual guest) and test it from a completely clean installation. And
document the *heck* out of what you do: you *will* be doing it again
(and again and again....).
> The only thing I can think
is that
> you manually created something as root and left it so backuppc
> couldn't write what it needed, or your mounts aren't really where
you
> think.
I would encourage you to simply use
a symlink. That should simplify things. Or even better: *don't*
use a symlink. Create a test system that has only a single partition
and get things working with just a small amount of data. Once you
can set up a server that can successfully back up, say, 1GB of data, then
you know what works. Then make a single change at a time (e.g. reinstall,
but using a symlink to a data partition) and see if it works. If
it does, great. If not, you know what you did wrong!
> Or if you installed, then copied
the installed files to a new
> place you didn't use 'cp -a' to preserve ownership and permissions.
And while there are a million reasons
why you might *think* that is a a good idea (copying/moving the files to
a new place), it is an absolutely *TERRIBLE* idea until you have at *least*
built a working configuration without doing so. (Even afterwards,
it's probably a terrible idea, but at least then you'll know conclusively
that it is the source of your problems or not.)
That spare PC used to set up a *VERY* straightforward system is getting
more and more important... :)
> > is there **anything** else I should do to ensure a "clean"
system state
> > before re-installing BackupPC?
Not to beat a dead horse (which is just
a way of saying that I'm *gonna* beat a dead horse), but I would leave
your current system alone and work on that pristine system on a spare PC
(or VM guest)... Once you know what works, you can compare it to
the system that doesn't.
And as an aside for the hordes that are hanging on my every word (right?
:) ), that's *always* a good plan: start with a machine
that you can reformat and reinstall from scratch--over and over and over
again--when you try to do something like implement a new software package...
And once you have it working the way you think you want it to work,
take *another* spare system (or guest VM) from scratch and use your copious
and detailed documentation (which you have, right?) to re-create the solution
as cleanly and straightforwardly as possible, updating the documentation
so that you have a 100% correlati0n between your documentation and your
solution.
For a computer consultant like myself,
who is always planning on being able to reproduce *any* solution for another
customer, such a procedure is automatic--and incredibly valuable.
Sorry if this seems like preaching or
condesending. I'm not trying to; it seems like you might benefit
from such a strategy.
Timothy J. Massey
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better
price-free! And you'll get a free "Love Thy Logs" t-shirt when you
download Logger. Secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsisghtdev2dev _______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [BackupPC-users] first "full" never completes, (continued)
- Re: [BackupPC-users] first "full" never completes, Les Mikesell
- Re: [BackupPC-users] first "full" never completes,
Timothy J Massey <=
- Re: [BackupPC-users] first "full" never completes, hansbkk
- Re: [BackupPC-users] first "full" never completes, Les Mikesell
- Re: [BackupPC-users] first "full" never completes, Richard Shaw
- Re: [BackupPC-users] first "full" never completes, Holger Parplies
- Re: [BackupPC-users] first "full" never completes, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
- Re: [BackupPC-users] first "full" never completes, hansbkk
- Re: [BackupPC-users] first "full" never completes, Timothy J Massey
- Re: [BackupPC-users] first "full" never completes, Les Mikesell
- Re: [BackupPC-users] first "full" never completes, hansbkk
- Re: [BackupPC-users] first "full" never completes, hansbkk
|
|
|