Hi,

Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2011-05-18 02:41:15 -0400 [Re: [BackupPC-users] 
Best NAS device to run BackupPC ?]:
> [...]
> let's end this thread...

great idea, I second that!

Timothy's point, as I understand it, was that if you *do* have buggy NFS
implementations, you have the choice of either putting time into fixing that
or putting time into implementing a different option (iSCSI, ATAoE), and that
not everyone enjoys the challenge of hacking a proprietary NAS device. You
do, and that's fine. I wouldn't, but I spend time on other topics where I
*know* there's a simple solution or workaround readily available, but I
prefer to go the complicated way - just for fun or for good reasons.

Your experience seems to indicate that NAS devices occasionally *do* have
buggy NFS implementations and other pitfalls, right? ;-)

I believe many if not all options have been pointed out, so let's either find
something we *really* disagree on or move on ...

Regards,
Holger

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its 
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran 
developers boost performance applications - including clusters. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/