On 5/4/2010 9:38 AM, Inno wrote:
> It's a very good idea. But with this solution I am forced to do a single full 
> then incrementals. And I'm not sure the speed of upload will be sufficient.

Rsync full backups still only transfer the differences from the last 
full.  They run slower than incrementals because they do a block 
checksum comparison even on unchanged files, but don't take a lot more 
bandwidth.  And since the previous full is the base for comparison, you 
don't  want to go too long between fulls.  If you backup both sites from 
both servers you should always get a complete run locally and if some of 
the remote targets don't complete every night the fulls will just become 
skewed which is probably a good idea anyway.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/